Denmark "fires" Moody's credit rating service 2 Years, 4 Months ago
I'm going to pat myself on the back here.
Only a few days ago I posted about how these fraudulent ratings agencies - Wall Street's #1 criminal accomplices - were going to destroy THEMSELVES by continuing their ridiculous charade that the (bankrupt) U.S. and UK have "AAA" credit ratings, while claiming the (bankrupt) Euro debtors all deserve "junk" ratings on their debts.
I said that soon even the SHEEP would start to tune them out, because even brainwashing victims will only tolerate a certain level of absurdity before their programming FAILS - and they begin to see the TRUTH.
So what do we see today? The biggest banks of Denmark have "fired" Moody's, stating simply:
...the opinions of ratings companies hold limited value.
Talk about UNDERSTATEMENT !!!
Remember that EVERY aspect of the banksters' financial empire is built on FRAUD, and all fraud is dependent on the CONFIDENCE of its victims to survive. As soon as that confidence evaporates the fraud MUST collapse.
Thus the banksters FANATICALLY suppress gold and silver to maintain confidence in their worthless paper currencies.
They FANATICALLY manipulate statistics about the U.S. economy - to maintain confidence in worthless U.S. Treasuries.
As Chief Liars, the ratings agencies are at least on with B.S. Bernanke itself in terms of the importance of their lies in maintaining CONFIDENCE. So when we have the banks of a Western nation simply and succinctly stating that the ratings agencies are IRRELEVANT this is a momentous event !!!
Understand that Danish banks are NOT part of the Western Facist banking cabal. As a result, THEIR banks were being given harsh ratings - while all the U.S./UK fraud-factories get fantasy-ratings on their own debt from the same ratintgs agencies.
Note that China has now created its OWN "international" ratings machinery. So just like we see the world's nations gravitating toward the renminbi as the world's new "reserve currency", we will likely see the (fraudulent) Western credit ratings agencies steadily shunned by more and more of the world - until (like the dollar) they simply disintegrate...
"Moody’s Fired by Danish Banks as Investors Show Support"
Denmark’s biggest banks are firing Moody’s Investors Service as they win assurances from some of the country’s biggest investors that the opinions of ratings companies hold limited value.
Nykredit A/S, Denmark’s biggest mortgage lender and Europe’s largest issuer of covered bonds backed by home loans, terminated its contract with Moody’s on April 13, citing its “volatile” views. Danske Bank A/S (DANSKE)’s mortgage unit Realkredit Danmark A/S, the country’s second-largest home-loan provider, dropped Moody’s in June. Jyske Bank A/S, Denmark’s second- biggest listed bank, is looking into ending its dealings with Moody’s, according to Steen Nygaard, its head of treasury.
“They have just crossed the line for fairness,” Nygaard said in an interview. “It’s not just that we have an opinion and if they rule against us, we are mad and walk away. It is about the fundamentals where we simply cannot follow Moody’s arguments.”
Moody’s in June criticized Denmark’s $470 billion mortgage- bond industry, the world’s third largest after the U.S. and Germany, for failing to curb refinancing risks fueled by a mismatch in funding and lending maturities. Since then, Nykredit’s benchmark index of Denmark’s most-traded mortgage bonds has risen 6.3 percent to a record, signaling investors are disregarding the warnings.
“Moody’s has more or less every second month found something new to think about,” Soeren Holm, group managing director of finance at Nykredit, said today on a conference call with investors.
The company “does not comment on its commercial relationships,” Jessica Sibado, a Moody’s spokeswoman, said in a phone interview yesterday. “Moody’s considers Denmark as having one of the strongest covered bond frameworks in Europe. However, since 2009, Danish covered bonds have been impacted by the weakening issuer credit strength” and “increasing refinancing risks,” she said.
The ratings company generated 31 percent of its $2.3 billion in sales last year from Europe, the Middle East and Asia combined, it said March 12. Nykredit and Jyske declined to reveal what they paid Moody’s for their ratings.
“It’s not that ratings don’t matter. Of course they do,” said Inger Huus Pedersen, head of fixed-income investments at Hellerup, Denmark-based pension fund PKA, which oversees about $27 billion in assets. “These mortgage bonds, we feel pretty secure about. It’s an old system that’s gone through a lot, which is why I’m quite secure about the system. History has shown us that ratings agencies make mistakes as well.”
Investors, companies and governments are starting to question the role of the ratings companies following their failure to identify some of the imbalances that led to the global financial crisis of 2008.
According to a 2011 U.S. Senate report, both Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s adjusted the way they graded mortgage-backed securities after Goldman Sachs Group Inc., UBS AG and at least six more banks pressured them. When the ratings companies changed their assessments in July 2007, it helped trigger the financial crisis, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said in April last year.
‘Little Market Reaction’
Europe is in the process of reviewing regulation of the ratings industry. One proposal would force companies to periodically cut client ties to remove conflicts of interest and increase competition. Denmark, which holds the rotating six- month European Union presidency, recommended this month limiting the proposal’s scope to structured finance instruments.
S&P’s decision to strip the U.S. of its top credit grade in August was followed by gains in the nation’s Treasury debt. U.S. government securities with maturities longer than a year have returned 4.2 percent, including reinvested interest, since S&P’s Aug. 5 downgrade. The Bank of England said March 27 there was “little market reaction” to Moody’s decision to cut the outlook on its Aaa rating to negative.
In Denmark, Moody’s has been tougher on mortgage banks than other rating companies. It ranked adjustable-rate bonds issued by Nykredit Aa1, compared with S&P’s AAA grade. Nykredit’s issuer rating at S&P is A+, its fifth-highest grade, with a stable outlook. Moody’s ranks the lender A2, its sixth-highest rating, with a negative outlook.
“Moody’s has shown a harsh stance on banks ratings compared to the other agencies,” said Marc Stacey, a fund manager at BlueBay Asset Management Ltd. in London, which oversees $42 billion in credit. “If Moody’s upcoming announcements show that they are an outlier, compared to where the other two rating agencies are, then you may find the Moody’s rating being dropped by more and more issuers.”
Nykredit fired Moody’s amid a review of 114 financial institutions in 16 countries. Moody’s said it may downgrade banks as much as three levels. BRFkredit A/S, another Danish mortgage lender, ended its dealings with Moody’s in October.
“If larger banks begin to look at the Danish banks and follow suit, this could potentially reduce the impact of the rating cuts and simplify matters for investors,” Prateek Datta, an analyst at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, said today in a note to investors.
“It’s not a matter of the rating being X or Y,” Holm said in a phone interview this week. “It’s a matter of volatility in their methods and approaches, and it’s a matter of the value for investors.”
‘There Are Risks’
Denmark’s two-century-old mortgage market has moved away from traditional, fixed-rate 30-year loans and started offering adjustable rates in 1996 and interest-only loans in 2003 to attract more customers. The country is still struggling to emerge from a recession triggered by a burst housing bubble in 2007. A regional banking crisis claimed three lenders last year.
“We agree there are risks, but they are less than when the house prices were in a bubble phase,” Nygaard said. “We cannot see the huge risk to the Danish economy. Jyske Bank is much stronger today that it was in 2007.”
Moody’s, which published its first guide to securities in 1900 after being founded by John Moody, cut Jyske Bank and five other Danish lenders last year after the government allowed Amagerbanken A/S to fail, passing losses on to senior creditors. Jyske is rated A2, with a negative outlook.
Moody’s rates Denmark’s government debt Aaa, with a stable outlook. The country is one of only 12 in the world to enjoy the top credit grade at Moody’s, S&P and Fitch Ratings.
While Denmark’s government debt is half the euro-area average at 44.6 percent of gross domestic product in 2012, the European Commission estimates, its private debt is the world’s highest. Household debt reached 310 percent of disposable incomes in 2010, according to Exane BNP Paribas. Danes’ savings, while high, are mostly “locked up” in hard-to-access pension and real estate assets, central bank Governor Nils Bernstein has said.
Adjustable-rate loans, as well as loans that delay principle payments by as much as 10 years, make up more than half Denmark’s outstanding homeowner debt, according to the Association of Danish Mortgage Banks. Bernstein has urged the industry to phase out interest-only loans, which he says erode economic stability.
Foreclosures jumped an annual 32 percent last month to a 17-year high, after Denmark’s economy fell into a recession in the second half and house prices sank an annual 8 percent in the fourth quarter.
“What Moody’s is doing is putting pressure on the system, and that is not necessarily a bad thing,” said Peter Lindegaard, head of investments for Danica Pension, a unit of Danske Bank. Still, Lindegaard said Danica, which holds 20 billion kroner in mortgage debt, won’t exit Nykredit’s bonds after the lender dropped Moody’s.
“We think we know as much as Moody’s about how the system works,” Lindegaard said in an interview. “We still deem them a very secure investment.”
Re: Denmark "fires" Moody's credit rating service 2 Years, 4 Months ago
samix wrote: Note that China has now created its OWN "international" ratings machinery. So just like we see the world's nations gravitating toward the renminbi as the world's new "reserve currency"
If renminbi becomes the next paper only reserve currency, then do you think that it will be the same cycle repeating for the next couple of decades ?
Could it be that our kids will be on this forum taking about how the bankers in China are manipulating the gold and silver market to prop up the renminbi ?
Samix, anyone who claims to know EXACTLY what China's government plans on doing (and why) is either trying to deceive others or just deluding themselves. However, we can use logic to tell us what they WON'T do - and through that to predict what they MIGHT do.
First, one thing we KNOW isn't possible is to go from a paper dollar as reserve currency to a gold-backed renminbi. Why isn't that possible?
The MOMENT that the gold-baccked renminbi was unveiled the dollar-holders would FINALLY understand that their paper dollars were worthless - and thus the TRANSITION to a gold-backed renimbi would CAUSE the very sort of hyperinflationary chaos in the West that EVERYONE wants to avoid.
Thus we KNOW there must be some intermediate step to move from the paper dollar to a gold-backed currency. The best theory I've been able to cobble together is that China's government is preparing a transition from a paper dollar to a paper renminbi BUT accumulating gold as fast as it can with the idea of TRANSORMING the renimbi to a gold-backed currency at a later date.
People can craft other theories, but they MUST revolve around some two-stage process. It's impossible (on a practical basis) to go from worthless paper dollars to a bona fide gold-backed currency.
BullionBullsCanada.com is not a registered investment advisor - Stock information is for educational purposes ONLY. Bullion Bulls Canada does not make "buy" or "sell" recommendations for any company. Rather, we seek to find and identify Canadian companies who we see as having good growth potential. It is up to individual investors to do their own "due diligence" or to consult with their financial advisor - to determine whether any particular company is a suitable investment for themselves.