Friday, September 19, 2014
   
Text Size

Search our Site or Google

The One Bank

Articles & Blogs - International Commentary

User Rating: / 50
PoorBest 

In 1980, in an infamous episode of “American Justice”; the Hunt Brothers were charged (and convicted) with attempting to “corner the silver market” – i.e. an attempt to monopolize it. At the time prosecution commenced, the Hunt Brothers had only managed to acquire less than 20% of total global inventories.

Nonetheless, given the strict provisions of our anti-trust laws this was a violation. In this one (relatively tiny) market; even a 20% concentration by a single entity is considered unacceptable. But that was when our governments were less-corrupt, and still enforced these laws on at least a semi-regular basis.

Flash ahead to 2013, and readers of my previous commentary were presented with the earth-shattering findings of a trio of Swiss researchers:

In detail, nearly 4/10 of the control over the economic value of [all transnational corporations] in the world is held, via a complicated web of ownership relations, by a group of 147 [transnational corporations] in the core, which has almost full control over itself. The top holders within the core can thus be thought of as an economic “super-entity” in the global network of corporations. A relevant additional fact at this point is that ¾ of the core are financial intermediaries. [emphasis mine]

In 1980, it was intolerable for one entity to have even a 20% share of one, small market. In 2013, the same cabal of (Western) governments has allowed a “super-entity” to acquire double that share – not of a single (small) market, or a whole sector, or even an entire economy. Rather, this is a single “super-entity” with 40% control of everything.

Of course when these researchers coined their term “super-entity”, they had no need of inventing new terminology. The word they were searching for was “monopoly”: a single monopoly with 40% control over the entire global economy.

Obviously what is being implied here is not minority control in every single market/sector/economy. Clearly this One Monopoly has a stranglehold over 40% of all markets/sectors/economies – with this obscene level of control spreading rapidly, like a particularly virulent economic cancer.

When the researchers speak of the ¾ of the “core” which are “financial intermediaries”; what this euphemistic language means is that ¾ of this giant monopoly are banks and bank holding-companies. The One Monopoly is one, big bank.

Despite its fraud-bloated size; the entire Western financial sector (all of these rapacious, utterly criminal Big Banks) would form only a small component of this One Bank. Thus while it is not necessarily true that the One Bank has effective control of all these fraud-factories; it is undoubtedly true that it controls the vast majority of them.

A “banking monopoly” with 40% control of all sectors of the global economy will obviously have a much, much higher concentration of control in the Heart of the Beast. The Big Banks of the West are literally “partners in crime” in the truest sense of that expression.

What is the crime being perpetrated by the One Bank? Anyone who reads even the diluted accounts of the Corporate Media will already know that the One Bank is involved in a cornucopia of crime, with the Attorney General of the United States, himself, publicly pledging to cover up all this (literal) organized crime. The One Bank is a crime syndicate.

However, among this litany of financial/economic atrocities, one grandiose scheme stands out above all others: nothing less than the economic enslavement of all humanity. While the “web” of corporate fronts which hides this obscene/illegal monolith may be intentionally convoluted; its strategy couldn’t be simpler.

Persuade/coerce all the Puppet Governments under its influence to intentionally become over-indebted, literally to the brink of bankruptcy…and then blood-suck. Steal a (large) portion of all the labours of all productive members of our society as so-called “interest payments” – forever.

The One Bank is above all else a gigantic parasite, claiming a large piece of all human production while earning none of it.

Understand that in one way or another, all of the massive/unrepayable bond debts of these Deadbeat Debtors are thoroughly tainted with fraud. How did (nearly) all of the West’s governments bury themselves in debt, far past the point of insolvency? They had a lot of help.

 

After these governments were already all on the threshold of insolvency; the One Bank sent its minions to begin whispering in the ears of all these Puppet Governments. The One Bank had “discovered” a magical way for all these governments to all borrow much, much more – and still remain solvent (claimed the minions).

The “magic” was via all the extremely complex (and entirely illegal) “financial derivatives” which the Puppet Governments had allowed these bankers to bring into existence. Indeed, the most-destructive/most-illegal form of these derivatives (credit-default swaps) had been explicitly banned in the U.S. for nearly a century based on anti-gambling statutes.

The promises of the minions of the One Bank were all lies. There was no “magic” way to permanently reduce interest rates, and thus permanently be able to (viably) finance much more debt.

When these financial fiduciaries (i.e. the minions of the One Bank) made their financial warranties which were unequivocally false, that was fraud. Moreover, the primary tool to perpetrate this fraud was credit-default swaps – i.e. illegal instruments.

All Western bond debts are the product of fraudulent misrepresentation, perpetrated through the use of illegal instruments (credit-default swaps, et al). According to the most basic tenets of the Rule of Law; all of these bond debts are now thoroughly tainted with fraud – and thus null-and-void as a matter of law.

The fact that our corrupt governments have (at best) passively facilitated the rape of their own economies, and “legitimized” all this bond fraud/crime by refusing to enforce their own laws cannot redeem the inherent fraud of these transactions.

When Debt Jubilee arrives and all these bond-debts are wiped clean (as they have been in previous historical episodes of similar, systemic fraud); the basis for eradicating all this debt will not be purely in morality, but also clearly in legality. The crime must end. Humanity must be allowed to remove the Yoke of the One Bank.

While undoubtedly many reader questions still remain about this malevolent “super-entity”, certainly one question rises above all others. Can we put a specific name to this “one bank”? Apparently so: Rothschild.

Many historical sources document the Rothschild clan as being unquestionably the wealthiest “house” on the planet in the 19th century, my own favorite source being the superlative documentary, The Money Masters. This clan has never suffered any significant, publicly-recorded financial set-back. Yet flash ahead to the early 21st century, and on any (so-called) “world’s wealthiest list” you will never see the Rothschild name appear.

Simply having “more money” makes it easier to accumulate (i.e. steal) even more money. Thus our presumption (if anything) is that House Rothschild would have extended the financial gap which separates these Misers from humanity.

The implication here is clear. The “world’s richest” lists compiled in the propaganda of the Corporate Media are simply the “B-list” billionaires. What does it mean to really be one of the “world’s wealthiest”? Being able to have your name removed from that propaganda list.

The Rothschilds, world’s wealthiest bankers of the 19th and 20th centuries, have (apparently) succeeded in creating One Bank, in order to greatly expand/accelerate their looting of all the wealth of humanity in the 21st century. How important is such a corporate front to the malevolent aspirations of House Rothschild?

Here the Swiss researchers are unequivocal:

In particular, the top ranked actors hold a control ten times bigger than what could be expected based on their wealth. [emphasis mine]

The One Bank is nothing less than a gigantic “amplifier” of financial crime – apparently the new crimes of House Rothschild. Such a paradigm leads one to paraphrase a piece of immortal verse from the legendary J.R.R. Tolkein:

One Bank to rule them all,

One Bank to find them,

One Bank to bring them all,

And in the darkness bind them.

We are all “bound” by the fraud-bonds of the One Bank. And until we finally/completely/irrevocably destroy this One Bank; we will remain the financial thralls of these real-life Dark Lords.

Trackback(0)
Comments (8)Add Comment
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, September 18, 2013
May I suggest implementing Islamic economics and declaring all interest based bonds null and void! >wink


Now there is an incendiary suggestion if I've ever seen one! smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/cheesy.gif

How about instead we implement "Jeff Nielson economics" (i.e. Debt Jubilee and wealth-taxation)?

We still get to the same place; BUT instead of angry ideologues objecting to "Muslim rule", all we get are a lot of confused people asking: "who is Jeff Nielson?" smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/cheesy.gif
samix
...
written by samix, September 18, 2013
May I suggest implementing Islamic economics and declaring all interest based bonds null and void! >wink
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, July 23, 2013
Jeff: the tentacles are everywhere; perhaps the most important is that the US military (and NATO) are the effective enforcement arms of the Rothschilds. It also doesn't hurt that many Directors of the CIA and MI6 have also been linked to the globalist NWO crowd...


More to the point, Apberusdisvet, is that research material such as what was sourced in my article prove that there is no "New World Order".

What we have is a gigantic Crime Syndicate trying to steal EVERYTHING. And there is "nothing older under the Sun" than THAT... smilies/wink.gif
apberusdisvet
...
written by apberusdisvet, July 22, 2013
Jeff: the tentacles are everywhere; perhaps the most important is that the US military (and NATO) are the effective enforcement arms of the Rothschilds. It also doesn't hurt that many Directors of the CIA and MI6 have also been linked to the globalist NWO crowd. Whenever a US President decides to be independent, assassinations (or attempts) follow. Jackson, Kennedy, and Reagan are key examples, with way too much circumstantial evidence to be considered coincidental. Also, the traitors among the 535 are either nominated for us, elected through fraud, or corrupted through blackmail. It will take a major revolution or a total economic reset to change the status quo, which may be coming sooner than later. The growing police state and totalitarian control has been on steroids since the false flag of 2001; if it walks, talks and squawks like a "desperate" duck, then it usually is.
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, July 22, 2013
Some while ago I posed the question what is the break-even retail price of a Krugerrand.
Well a recent interview of Mark Mahaffey co-founder of the Hinde Gold Fund on Bull Market Thinking stated that the real "all in" break-even production costs of an ounce of Gold was $1750. The price is $1300. He also stated the price in 1980 was $800 and the PRODUCTION COST was $100 !!!!

Do you think this tells us something?


GeorgeSilver, such analysis always "tells us something". However, it's important that we not EXTRAPOLATE more than what the data actually tells us.

As I remarked to a previous comment (your own?); it's now virtually impossible to put a FIXED "all-in" price on what number is required to make the gold/silver mining industry sustainable.

You CAN'T "put a price on manipulation."

Suppose gold was at $5,000/oz and silver was at $200/oz; BUT the Banksters keep all the share prices of these companies near-zero. The industry still wouldn't be "sustainable".

Living in "capitalist" economies which run on CREDIT, you can't stay in business if you can't finance operations; and you can't finance operations with near-zero market caps. smilies/sad.gif
georgesilver
...
written by George Silver, July 22, 2013
Dear Jeff
Some while ago I posed the question what is the break-even retail price of a Krugerrand.
Well a recent interview of Mark Mahaffey co-founder of the Hinde Gold Fund on Bull Market Thinking stated that the real "all in" break-even production costs of an ounce of Gold was $1750. The price is $1300. He also stated the price in 1980 was $800 and the PRODUCTION COST was $100 !!!!

Do you think this tells us something?
Jeff Nielson
...
written by Jeff Nielson, July 22, 2013
True, Jeff...but...the problem is that, first of all, the report by the Swissies isn't new. It's been out for a few, if not several, years already. And the knowledge of it hasn't slowed these megalomaniacal uberwealthy ubergreedy, arrogant criminazis one little bit, as far as I can tell.

Secondly, since essentially all in power ALREADY KNOW about them and probably receive "thank you'$$$" from them regularly, the question becomes...so what? Who is going to stop this ongoing crime? TPTB? LOL...They're in the pockets of these oligarchs, those that don't already belong to or hold a position in one of their "firms" in some way, shape, or form. Which agency is going to break this monster up?...the CFTC?...yeah, that's a joke, isn't it. Our bought and paid for Congress? Our Manchurian Candidate Prez? He'd have to give up his 10-figure bank acct hidden at the Vatican...and I wouldn't hold my breath that that would ever happen.

So, once again, the crime of the century(ies) continues with noone willing and able to stop it.


Jt, if this research has been out a while, that is ALSO "news" to me (lol). It was reported at Forbes Magazine as if it was new research -- which is why I made the presumption myself.

Yes, destroying the One Bank would/will be a task only slightly less-daunting than destroying the mythical "One Ring" from The Lord of the Rings. But here the allegory remains true. DESPITE the difficulty of the task we have absolutely no choice.

It is impossible to "make the world a better place" while the One Bank continues to exist.

Understand that all things Evil wither in the light. Simply EXPOSING the existence of the One Bank is the most-important step in ending its existence.
jtjtjt
...
written by jt, July 21, 2013
True, Jeff...but...the problem is that, first of all, the report by the Swissies isn't new. It's been out for a few, if not several, years already. And the knowledge of it hasn't slowed these megalomaniacal uberwealthy ubergreedy, arrogant criminazis one little bit, as far as I can tell.

Secondly, since essentially all in power ALREADY KNOW about them and probably receive "thank you'$$$" from them regularly, the question becomes...so what? Who is going to stop this ongoing crime? TPTB? LOL...They're in the pockets of these oligarchs, those that don't already belong to or hold a position in one of their "firms" in some way, shape, or form. Which agency is going to break this monster up?...the CFTC?...yeah, that's a joke, isn't it. Our bought and paid for Congress? Our Manchurian Candidate Prez? He'd have to give up his 10-figure bank acct hidden at the Vatican...and I wouldn't hold my breath that that would ever happen.

So, once again, the crime of the century(ies) continues with noone willing and able to stop it.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Latest Commentary

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

Latest Comments

Disclaimer:

BullionBullsCanada.com is not a registered investment advisor - Stock information is for educational purposes ONLY. Bullion Bulls Canada does not make "buy" or "sell" recommendations for any company. Rather, we seek to find and identify Canadian companies who we see as having good growth potential. It is up to individual investors to do their own "due diligence" or to consult with their financial advisor - to determine whether any particular company is a suitable investment for themselves.

Login Form